Walking through the illuminated streets of Seoul, it’s jarring to realise just how large the golf scene is, despite never once seeing a fairway or a green outside of a simulator.
In a city defined by density, verticality, and relentless efficiency, golf has not only survived but flourished. The game has adapted. Everywhere you look, golf is present: standalone clothing boutiques from the world’s biggest brands, equipment flagships, cafés built around simulator bays, and entire mall floors dedicated solely to the sport. Yet outside the city, physical golf courses are scarce, distant, or inaccessible to most.
This raises an intriguing question: why do countries with far greater access to real golf courses not cultivate the same level of cultural and commercial presence around the game?
Golf as an Urban Lifestyle, Not a Destination
In South Korea, golf is not primarily a place you go, it’s something you participate in as part of daily urban life.
Simulators are the backbone of this ecosystem. They are everywhere: tucked into office buildings, apartment complexes, shopping centres, and nightlife districts. You don’t need a car, a half-day commitment, or social membership approval. You need an hour, a screen, and a swing.
This accessibility reshapes how people relate to the sport. Golf becomes:
- A post-work activity rather than a weekend event
- A social or business tool rather than a retreat
- A measurable, gamified skill rather than a pastoral experience
In contrast, in countries with abundant physical courses, golf often remains spatially and psychologically distant. Courses are outside cities, hidden behind gates, and framed as destinations rather than habits.
Retail Density Reflects Cultural Density
What stands out in Seoul is not just participation, but retail confidence.
Golf brands don’t hide in the corner of sports stores. They dominate premium retail real estate. Apparel lines are presented like luxury fashion houses. Equipment launches feel closer to tech unveilings than sporting goods releases.
This works because the audience is already there. The consumer doesn’t need to be convinced that golf is relevant—they are actively engaging with it multiple times a week, even if only digitally.
In many Western markets, golf retail assumes participation is occasional and aging. Stores are placed on city outskirts or within specialist outlets, reinforcing the idea that golf is niche, seasonal, or declining. Seoul proves the opposite: golf thrives when it is visible, fashionable, and woven into everyday life.
Elitism Without Exclusivity
Interestingly, when speaking to locals, golf is still widely regarded as an elitist sport—much like it is elsewhere in the world. But the expression of that elitism is different.
In South Korea, status is not derived from access to land, but from:
- Skill and measurable improvement
- Equipment knowledge and brand fluency
- Fashion and presentation
- Participation in a modern, aspirational subculture
The barrier is no longer acreage—it’s commitment, competence, and taste.
In countries with plentiful courses, elitism is often tied directly to physical space: private clubs, green fees, dress codes, and historical exclusion. Ironically, this abundance of “real golf” can make the game feel more closed off than Seoul’s simulator-driven ecosystem.
Why Course-Rich Countries Haven’t Followed Suit
So why haven’t countries with more land and more courses created similar urban golf cultures?
Part of the answer lies in tradition acting as friction. Golf’s identity in many regions is tightly bound to nature, etiquette, and heritage. Innovation is often framed as dilution rather than evolution. Simulators are seen as substitutes, not gateways.
There’s also a planning issue. Golf infrastructure developed alongside suburban sprawl, not dense urban living. Retail and participation followed the geography of courses rather than the geography of people.
Seoul flipped this logic. Instead of asking where can we put courses?, it asked how do people already live—and how can golf fit into that?
A Glimpse of Golf’s Urban Future
Seoul’s golf scene suggests that the future of the sport may not lie in defending tradition, but in re-imagining access.
As cities densify, time becomes scarcer, and younger generations prioritise flexibility and social integration, golf’s survival may depend less on fairways and more on adaptability. Simulators, retail presence, fashion-forward branding, and cultural visibility are not threats to the game—they may be its next chapter.
Walking through Seoul, you realise something unexpected: golf doesn’t need grass to grow. It needs relevance.
0 comments